Re: [PATCH v11 00/15] khugepaged: mTHP support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maybe in the Great Glorious Future (how many of those do we have?!) it would
be a good idea to take this kinds of things into account. Just because we can
map a THP, doesn't mean we should.

Shower thought: it might be in these cases especially where the FreeBSD
reservation system comes in handy - best effort allocating a THP, but not
actually mapping it as such until you really _know_ it is hot - and until
then, memory reclaim can just break your THP down if it really needs to.

This is just silly. All downsides without benefit until maybe later. And
for short-lived processes the "later" never comes.

Right, that's why I've also been arguing against that (we discussed it recently in the THP cabal).

--
Cheers

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux