Re: [PATCH] docs: Remove remainders of reiserfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 11:43 AM Stephen Smalley
<stephen.smalley.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 6:04 AM David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Reiserfs has been removed in 6.13, there are still some mentions in the
> > documentation about it and the tools. Remove those that don't seem
> > relevant anymore but keep references to reiserfs' r5 hash used by some
> > code.
> >
> > There's one change in a script scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh but it
> > does not seem to be relevant either.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> > diff --git a/scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh b/scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh
> > index db40237e60ce7e..77368a73f11171 100755
> > --- a/scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh
> > +++ b/scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh
> > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ cd /etc/selinux/dummy/contexts/files
> >  $SF -F file_contexts /
> >
> >  mounts=`cat /proc/$$/mounts | \
> > -       grep -E "ext[234]|jfs|xfs|reiserfs|jffs2|gfs2|btrfs|f2fs|ocfs2" | \
> > +       grep -E "ext[234]|jfs|xfs|jffs2|gfs2|btrfs|f2fs|ocfs2" | \
> >         awk '{ print $2 '}`
> >  $SF -F file_contexts $mounts
> >
>
> Just commenting on the selinux part, this entire list of filesystem
> types could likely be removed and replaced by just running "fixfiles
> relabel" instead, which on modern kernels (>= 2.6.30) will check for
> the "seclabel" option in /proc/self/mounts entries to determine which
> filesystems support security labeling.

... but in the meantime this patch looks fine.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux