On Sun, 2025-08-10 at 12:46 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 08:44:58AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sat, 2025-08-09 at 19:40 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > Reorganize README to provide targeted documentation paths for different > > > user roles including developers, researchers, security experts, > > > maintainers, and AI coding assistants. Add quick start section and > > > essential docs links. > > > > > > Include proper attribution requirements for AI-assisted contributions > > > using Assisted-by tags with agent details and tools used. > > > > Nicely done. > > Thanks Joe! > > > Perhaps the 'Assisted-by:' tag should not be limited to AI > > assistance but could also be used when accepted notes were > > given on any revised patch submission. > > The suggestions from the previous patches around expanding this to be a > list of tools rather than just "AI" made sense, this is the example I > gave in the cover letter: > > Assisted-by: Claude-claude-3-opus-20240229 checkpatch > > I find something like that useful because it tells me from the get-go > that the submitter ran checkpatch on it (without having to spend a line > in the commit message saying the same). > > I'm not sure about mixing human feedback into this, it might be > difficult to interpert it later. > > It might work more naturally as an extension of Reviewed-by? > > Reviewed-by: Developer A <a@b.c> # Improved the XYZ algorithm Maybe. Dunno. Sometimes I just give style suggestions or notes for things I'm cc'd on but I don't really review it as a "Reviewed-by:" tag seems to imply a more formal process. > > Oh, and maybe a checkpatch update like this? [] > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl [] > > @@ -641,6 +641,7 @@ our $signature_tags = qr{(?xi: > > Reviewed-by:| > > Reported-by:| > > Suggested-by:| > > + Assisted-by:| > > To:| > > Cc: > > )}; > > Yup, makes sense! I'll start including checkpatch updates going forward. If the AI/coding 'Assisted-by:' tag doesn't have an email address, then checkpatch is going to complain anyway. Something in checkpatch's # Check signature styles block starting around line 3040 or so will also need updating.