On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 07:55:27 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07.08.25 01:48, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 10:14:39PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>
> >> But yeah, whether these "as is" pages are movable or not is a good question
> >> as well -- in particular when zsmalloc supports page migration and the "as
> >> is" pages would not.
> >
> > By "as is" page, do you mean the page which the reclaim code is trying
> > to reclaim or the page within zsmalloc on which the content of original
> > pages are copied as is?
>
> I mean whatever the "dst" is here.
>
> + if (zswap_save_as_is(comp_ret, dlen, page)) {
> + comp_ret = 0;
> + dlen = PAGE_SIZE;
> + memcpy_from_page(dst, page, 0, dlen);
>
> IIUC SJ correctly, in case of zsmalloc "dst" is just the same page that
> would have stored encrypted data.
You correctly understood me.
>
> If that is the case, nothing should change, really.
>
> Thanks for clarifying, all!
Thank you for asking this important question, too, David! :)
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
