Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Agreed, this breaks more than it fixes. > > Python 2.7 reached end-of-life over five years ago. Do we really have to > cater for ancient stuff? Which actual real world cases do not have > Python 3+ available? Please just let it go, and see if anyone ever > notices? I kind of have to agree. The only real Python 2 user I know about is OpenOffice.org, which promises to get off any year now. Meanwhile, as I recall, the advice from the Python project is to say "python3" and not count on bare "python" being available. jon
