On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 03:00:46PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Also, I would argue that it would be useful in the change log as if there's > a bug in the generated code, you know who or *what* to blame. Especially if > there is a pattern to be found. Yeah, this is where I feel like it's the most potentially useful. Since they are distinctly code-generators, we should include the info to identify it. We include version numbers and such the compilers and linkers, though they are only informally included in commit logs when dealing with specific problems. Having had to do "find all commits from [set of authors]" research for security audits, I would be very unhappy if I had to do this again in the future for a specific Agent (used any author), and had to loop lore into the process. Yes, it's *doable*, but it'd be very annoying. -- Kees Cook
