Hi Reinette,
On 7/17/25 23:02, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 7/8/25 3:17 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>
>> +/*
>> + * resctrl_bmec_files_show() — Controls the visibility of BMEC-related resctrl
>> + * files. When @show is true, the files are displayed; when false, the files
>> + * are hidden.
>> + */
>> +static void resctrl_bmec_files_show(struct rdt_resource *r, bool show)
>
> The "void" return is unexpected since many of the calls can fail. It looks to me
> that this is indeed intentional since there is no BMEC feature checking, but instead
> the existence of the resctrl files are implicitly used as feature check. Doing so enables
> this code to be called on any system whether BMEC is supported or not and thus a failure
> should not be considered an actual failure. If this is the case, then it is subtle so please
> add this information to the function's comments. If this is not the case, could you
> please explain the void return?
Yes. Returned void because in some cases one of the config files may not
be available. Added a comment now.
"Don't treat kernfs_find_and_get failure as an error, since this function
may be called regardless of whether BMEC is supported or the event is
enabled."
>
>> +{
>> + struct kernfs_node *kn_config, *l3_mon_kn;
>> + char name[32];
>> +
>> + sprintf(name, "%s_MON", r->name);
>> + l3_mon_kn = kernfs_find_and_get(kn_info, name);
>> + if (!l3_mon_kn)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + kn_config = kernfs_find_and_get(l3_mon_kn, "mbm_total_bytes_config");
>> + if (kn_config) {
>> + kernfs_show(kn_config, show);
>> + kernfs_put(kn_config);
>> + }
>> +
>> + kn_config = kernfs_find_and_get(l3_mon_kn, "mbm_local_bytes_config");
>> + if (kn_config) {
>> + kernfs_show(kn_config, show);
>> + kernfs_put(kn_config);
>> + }
>> +
>> + kernfs_put(l3_mon_kn);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int resctrl_mbm_assign_mode_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>> struct seq_file *s, void *v)
>> {
>> @@ -2659,6 +2690,12 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir_info_resdir(void *priv, char *name,
>> ret = resctrl_mkdir_event_configs(r, kn_subdir);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> + /*
>> + * Hide BMEC related files if mbm_event mode
>> + * is enabled.
>> + */
>> + if (resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r))
>> + resctrl_bmec_files_show(r, false);
>
> Looks like the kernfs_find_and_get(kn_info, name) in resctrl_bmec_files_show()
> can be avoided by providing the kn as parameter. I think you may be doing it like
> this because of how resctrl_bmec_files_show() is used in resctrl_mbm_assign_mode_write()
> in the next patch. I think the kn can still be provided as parameter but
> resctrl_mbm_assign_mode_write() will set it to NULL and only then does
> resctrl_bmec_files_show() need to figure it out itself.
Sure. Passed kernfs_node now. If the node is NULL then use
kernfs_find_and_get() to get the pointer to the node.
>
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> Reinette
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
