On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 09:50:12AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 06:48:42PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote: > > > Ahh, thanks for this, that saved a lot of my time! And yes, I see some > > functions in eventq.c calling the iopf_group_response which settles the > > CMD_RESUME. So.. I assume these resume commands would be trapped and > > *actually* executed through this or a similar path for vPRI. > > Yes, that is what Intel did. PRI has to be tracked in the kernel > because we have to ack requests eventually. If the VMM crashes the > kernel has to ack everything and try to clean up. > I see.. thanks for clarifying! > Also SMMUv3 does not support PRI today, just stall. > Ack. Thanks! > Jason Praan
