Hi, On 7/7/25 1:26 PM, Brigham Campbell wrote: > Remove TODO item from drm documentation to transition away from using > mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros now that the work is complete. > > Signed-off-by: Brigham Campbell <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 18 ------------------ > 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst > index be8637da3fe9..76afb8a784e3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst > @@ -497,24 +497,6 @@ Contact: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Level: Intermediate > > -Transition away from using mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() > -------------------------------------------------- > - > -The macros mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq() and mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() are > -non-intuitive because, if there are errors, they return out of the *caller's* > -function. We should move all callers to use mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi() > -and mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi() macros instead. > - > -Once all callers are transitioned, the macros and the functions that they call, > -mipi_dsi_generic_write_chatty() and mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_chatty(), can > -probably be removed. Alternatively, if people feel like the _multi() variants > -are overkill for some use cases, we could keep the mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() > -variants but change them not to return out of the caller. > - > -Contact: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > - > -Level: Starter > - > Remove devm_drm_put_bridge() > ---------------------------- > Personally I think there's merit in keeping this TODO around until all the other mipi_dsi functions are transitioned as well and removed entirely. Maybe rewording it to reflect this could be better? -- Tejas Vipin
