Re: [PATCH v3] ipv6: add `force_forwarding` sysctl to enable per-interface forwarding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On July 2, 2025 11:58:16 PM PDT, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Le 03/07/2025 à 00:26, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
>
>[snip]
>
>>>> +static int addrconf_sysctl_force_forwarding(const struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
>>>> +					    void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	int *valp = ctl->data;
>>>> +	int ret;
>>>> +	int old, new;
>>>> +
>>>> +	// get extra params from table
>>> /* */ for comment
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst#n598
>> 
>> Hm, lots there from the BK to git transfer in 2005, with a few updates by Mauro, Jakub, and myself.
>> 
>> 
>> More recently (2016!), Linus said this:
>>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFyQYJerovMsSoSKS7PessZBr4vNp-3QUUwhqk4A4_jcbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> 
>> which seems to allow for "//" style commenting. But yeah, it hasn't been added to
>> coding-style.rst.
>I wasn't aware. I always seen '//' rejected.
>
>> 
>>>> +	struct inet6_dev *idev = ctl->extra1;
>>>> +	struct net *net = ctl->extra2;
>>> Reverse x-mas tree for the variables declaration
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst#n368
>> 
>> Shouldn't maintainer-netdev.rst contain something about netdev-style comment blocks?
>> (not that I'm offering since I think it's ugly)
>> 
>It has been removed:
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=82b8000c28b5
>

Oh, thanks.  Sorry I missed that patch. 



~Randy





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux