Re: [PATCH 7/7] docs: kdoc: pretty up dump_enum()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Em Tue,  1 Jul 2025 14:57:30 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
>>                  self.emit_msg(ln,
>> -                              f"expecting prototype for enum {self.entry.identifier}. Prototype was for enum {declaration_name} instead")
>> +                              f"expecting prototype for enum {self.entry.identifier}. "
>> +                              f"Prototype was for enum {declaration_name} instead")
>
> Even being a big one, my personal preference would be to break the long
> string here, as keeping together is easier for grep, but yeah, I also
> considered breaking it ;-)

Did you mean your preference would be to *not* break it?

There's a non-greppable piece at the break point anyway, so I wasn't
anticipating making life harder for anybody there.

Thanks,

jon




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux