On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 10:18:03AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:38:44PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > +static void ionic_flush_qs(struct ionic_ibdev *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ionic_qp *qp, *qp_tmp;
> > > + struct ionic_cq *cq, *cq_tmp;
> > > + LIST_HEAD(flush_list);
> > > + unsigned long index;
> > > +
> > > + /* Flush qp send and recv */
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
> > > + xa_for_each(&dev->qp_tbl, index, qp) {
> > > + kref_get(&qp->qp_kref);
> > > + list_add_tail(&qp->ibkill_flush_ent, &flush_list);
> > > + }
> > > + rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > Same question as for CQ. What does RCU lock protect here?
>
> It should protect the kref_get against free of qp. The qp memory must
> be RCU freed.
I'm not sure that this was intension here. Let's wait for an answer from the author.
>
> But this pattern requires kref_get_unless_zero()
>
> Jason
