Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Em Sun, 22 Jun 2025 14:58:04 -0600 > Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> escreveu: > >> Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 08:02:44 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> >> As reported by Akira, there were incompatibility issues with >> >> Sphinx and docutils with docutils 0.19. There's already >> >> a fix for it, but, as there are incompatibility issues with >> >> different versions, better to add a check to verify if the >> >> combination is supported/tested. >> >> >> > >> > I've been skeptical of adding such checks in conf.py. >> >> I have to kind of agree with this concern. We have managed without this >> complexity so far. It looks like we could always be behind on >> maintaining it going forward. Do we *really* need this one? > > IMO having a check is interesting, as the dependency between > Sphinx and docutils is high. Yet, with the testing script, this may > not be needed, provided that we run it to check if changes at Sphinx > extensions won't cause regressions. Still, the dependency check > at test_doc_build.py is not complete. > > Anyway, if you prefer, don't pick this one. We can revisit it later > when needed. I've left it out for now, but applied the rest of the series. Keep it around, we may yet decide we need it... Thanks, jon
