On June 24, 2025 10:43:26 AM PDT, Xin Li <xin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 6/24/2025 10:06 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025, Xin Li wrote: >>> Any chance we could merge FRED ahead of CET? >> >> Probably not? CET exists is publicly available CPUs. AFAIK, FRED does not. > >Better not, as you said it creates extra effort because FRED does lean a >bit on CET. > >I was a bit worried that CET would take longer time than expected... > >> And CET is (/knock wood) hopefully pretty much ready? FWIW, I'd really like to > >That is also my reading on CET. > >> get both CET and FRED virtualization landed by 6.18, i.e. in time for the next >> LTS. > >I love the plan! > >FRED is my top priority. I’ll address all your comments, rebase onto >kvm-x86/next (you have not updated yet :) ), and send out v5 at an >appropriate time. > >Thanks! > Xin > FRED doesn't lean on CET... one could argue it leans on LASS, at least to a small extent, though.
