On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 11:12 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 09:27:24AM +0300, Abdelrahman Fekry wrote: > > @@ -1028,13 +1134,15 @@ tcp_shrink_window - BOOLEAN > > window can be offered, and that TCP implementations MUST ensure > > that they handle a shrinking window, as specified in RFC 1122. > > > > - - 0 - Disabled. The window is never shrunk. > > - - 1 - Enabled. The window is shrunk when necessary to remain within > > + Possible values: > > + > > + - 0 (disabled) The window is never shrunk. > > + - 1 (enabled) The window is shrunk when necessary to remain within > > the memory limit set by autotuning (sk_rcvbuf). > > This only occurs if a non-zero receive window > > scaling factor is also in effect. > > The indentation for enabled option outputted like a definition list, > so I fix it up: > Noted , fixed it and checked for other problems like this , thank you > Thanks. > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
