Em Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:14:57 +0900 Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Mauro! > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 09:44:30 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:22:48 +0900 > > Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > [...] > > > > > I didn't test it yet, but yesterday I wrote a script which allows us to test > > for Sphinx version breakages on multiple versions in one go. > > > > Using it (and again before this patch, but after my parser-yaml series), I > > noticed that 6.0.1 with "-jauto" with those packages: > > Why did you pick 6.0.1, which was in the middle of successive releases in > early 6.x days. I added all major,minor,latest-patch version since 3.4.3 and added to the script. I didn't check what of those are inside a distro or not. > No distro Sphinx packagers have picked this version. The hole idea is to have a script where we can automate build tests with old versions. Perhaps it makes a sense to add a flag at the table indicating what major distros have what sphinx version and a command line parameter to either test all or just the ones shipped on major distros. > > Just see the release history: > > [2022-10-16] 5.3.0 ### stable ### > [2022-12-29] 6.0.0 > [2023-01-05] 6.0.1 > [2023-01-05] 6.1.0 6.1.1 > [2023-01-07] 6.1.2 > [2023-01-10] 6.1.3 ### stable ### > [2023-04-23] 6.2.0 > > The crash you observed is hardly related to this fix. Almost certainly, the breakage with 6.0.1 is unrelated to this change. > I'd ignore this report as a random noise. > My Tested-by: still stands. > > Regards, > Akira >
