On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 07:19:51 +0800 Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sure, I'll prepare a revert patch to address the issue and plan to > submit it for backporting to -stable. > > However, I'd like to confirm whether the following patch series > structure would be appropriate: > > - Patch 1: Revert 866898efbb25 and CC it to stable > - Patch 2–8: Introduce the new equality-aware heap API > - Patch 9: Revert Patch 1 and switch bcache to use the new API > > In this case, we would only backport Patch 1 to stable. > > Alternatively, would you prefer we simply revert 866898efbb25 without > introducing and using the new API in the same series? Yes, just the revert for now, please. Let's not make that dependent on new development.
