Re: [PATCH v7 2/9] arm64: report address tag when FEAT_MTE_TAGGED_FAR is supported

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark.
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 02:58:11PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
>
> >  	 * The architecture specifies that bits 63:60 of FAR_EL1 are UNKNOWN
> >  	 * for tag check faults. Set them to corresponding bits in the untagged
> > -	 * address.
> > +	 * address if ARM64_MTE_FAR isn't supported.
> > +	 * Otherwise, bits 63:60 of FAR_EL1 are KNOWN.
> >  	 */
>
> Should that be "are UNKNOWN"?

Otherwise in here mentions the case when ARM64_MTE_FAR is supported,
So the bits 63:60 of FAR_EL1 are "not UNKNOWN" but I write it with
KNOWN.
Do you want to change this to "not UNKNOWN"?
or Am I missing something?

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux