On 09/06/2025 17:03, Kory Maincent wrote: > Le Mon, 9 Jun 2025 14:03:46 +0300, > Gal Pressman <gal@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> On 09/06/2025 11:36, Kory Maincent wrote: >>> Le Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:17:59 +0300, >>> Gal Pressman <gal@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : >>> >>>> On 28/05/2025 10:31, Paolo Abeni wrote: >> [...] >>>> >>>> Are all new uapi changes expected to come with a test that exercises the >>>> functionality? >>> >>> I don't think so and I don't think it is doable for now on PSE. There is >>> nothing that could get the PSE control of a dummy PSE controller driver. We >>> need either the support for a dummy PHY driver similarly to netdevsim or >>> the support for the MDI ports. >>> By luck Maxime Chevallier is currently working on both of these tasks and >>> had already sent several times the patch series for the MDI port support. >>> >> >> We shouldn't rule it out so quickly, testing is important, let's try to >> accommodate to our rules. >> >> Why can't this be tested on real hardware using a drivers/net/hw >> selftest? The test can skip if it lacks the needed hardware. >> Or rebase this over Maxime's work? > > How should I do it if I need to use ethtool to test it? It is a vicious circle > as ethtool need this to be merge before supporting it. > Would it be ok to accept it like that and wait for ethtool support to add the > selftest? > Otherwise I could test it through ynl python command but there is no similar > cases in the selftest. I think that in theory the userspace patches need to be posted together with the kernel, from maintainer-netdev.rst: User space code exercising kernel features should be posted alongside kernel patches. This gives reviewers a chance to see how any new interface is used and how well it works. I am not sure if that's really the case though. > > Nevertheless, it would have been nicer to point this out earlier in the series. I agree, we also encountered the same thing :\... I tried to convince the maintainer [1] that this needs to be documented more clearly, but got ignored. The current rule we have is: "Broadly, any new uAPI should come with tests which exercise the functionality." [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3a3ce4c2-5cc1-4deb-be47-d936b61c42c4@xxxxxxxxxx/