[PATCH 7/9] docs: kdoc: remove some ineffective code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The code testing for a pointer declaration in process_name() has no actual
effect on subsequent actions; remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
---
 scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
index 7c635000f3de..4e1ab28ff7cc 100644
--- a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
+++ b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
@@ -1229,11 +1229,6 @@ class KernelDoc:
             parenthesis = r"(?:\(\w*\))?"   # optional parenthesis on function
             decl_end = r"(?:[-:].*)"         # end of the name part
 
-            # test for pointer declaration type, foo * bar() - desc
-            r = KernRe(fr"^{decl_start}([\w\s]+?){parenthesis}?\s*{decl_end}?$")
-            if r.search(line):
-                self.entry.identifier = r.group(1)
-
             # Test for data declaration
             r = KernRe(r"^\s*\*?\s*(struct|union|enum|typedef)\b\s*(\w*)")
             r2 = KernRe(fr"^{decl_start}{fn_type}(?:define\s+)?(\w+)\s*{parenthesis}\s*{decl_end}?$")
-- 
2.49.0





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux