Re: [PATCH] docs: trace: boottime-trace.rst: fix typo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 27 May 2025 10:01:45 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 26 May 2025 21:40:46 +0800
> Runji Liu <runjiliu.tech@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Replace misspelled "eariler" with "earlier" and drop the stray period
> > after "example".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Runji Liu <runjiliu.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

This looks good to me. Thanks!

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>


> 
> -- Steve
> 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/trace/boottime-trace.rst | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/trace/boottime-trace.rst b/Documentation/trace/boottime-trace.rst
> > index d594597201fd..3efac10adb36 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/trace/boottime-trace.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/trace/boottime-trace.rst
> > @@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ Most of the subsystems and architecture dependent drivers will be initialized
> >  after that (arch_initcall or subsys_initcall). Thus, you can trace those with
> >  boot-time tracing.
> >  If you want to trace events before core_initcall, you can use the options
> > -starting with ``kernel``. Some of them will be enabled eariler than the initcall
> > -processing (for example,. ``kernel.ftrace=function`` and ``kernel.trace_event``
> > +starting with ``kernel``. Some of them will be enabled earlier than the initcall
> > +processing (for example, ``kernel.ftrace=function`` and ``kernel.trace_event``
> >  will start before the initcall.)
> >  
> >  
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux