On 5/26/25 19:48, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:14:43AM +0100, George Anthony Vernon wrote:
Make small grammar fixes to Amiga joystick documentation.
Also make heading adornments compliant with the guidelines to improve
organisation of the page.
Split up these two changes into separate patches.
The word "also" in a changelog is indeed a hint that a patch is doing
too many things.
For a simple patch like this, though, I would not force a resend just
for that.
Do you mean keeping the patch as-is?
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Amiga joystick extensions
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+===============
+Amiga joysticks
+===============
I would prefer to keep section adornments in this doc as-is, though.
...and why...? We have a standard progression, why not use it?
I'm leaning towards following doc-specific convention (i.e. on this
doc). I could adapt to it, but some time later when I re-read the
source I might be semantically confused.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
