Re: [PATCH] cpufreq, docs: (userspace governor) add that actual freq is >= scaling_setspeed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/22/25 3:05 AM, Shashank Balaji wrote:
> The userspace governor does not have the CPUFREQ_GOV_STRICT_TARGET flag, which
> means the requested frequency may not strictly be followed. This is true in the
> case of the intel_pstate driver with HWP enabled. When programming the
> HWP_REQUEST MSR, the min_perf is set to `scaling_setspeed`, and the max_perf
> is set to the policy's max. So, the hardware is free to increase the frequency
> beyond the requested frequency.
> 
> This behaviour can be slightly surprising, given the current wording "allows
> userspace to set the CPU frequency". Hence, document this.
> 

In my opinion, the documentation is correct, and it is the
implementation in intel_pstate that is wrong. If the user wanted two
separate knobs that control the minimum and maximum frequencies, they
could leave intel_pstate in "active" mode and change scaling_min_freq
and scaling_max_freq.

If the user asks for the frequency to be set from userspace, the
frequency had damn well better be set from userspace.

- Russell




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux