On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:27:37PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
>
> Commit 5b39db6037e7 ("arm64: el2_setup.h: Rename some labels to be more
> diff-friendly") reworked the labels in __init_el2_fgt to say what's
> skipped rather than what the target location is. The exception was
> "set_fgt_" which is where registers are written. In reviewing the BRBE
> additions, Will suggested "set_debug_fgt_" where HDFGxTR_EL2 are
> written. Doing that would partially revert commit 5b39db6037e7 undoing
> the goal of minimizing additions here, but it would follow the
> convention for labels where registers are written.
>
> So let's do both. Branches that skip something go to a "skip" label and
> places that set registers have a "set" label. This results in some
> double labels, but it makes things entirely consistent.
>
> While we're here, the SME skip label was incorrectly named, so fix it.
>
> Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This one can be applied even if the rest of the series is not.
Cheers, Rob. I'll grab this one.
Will
