Em Tue, 20 May 2025 17:22:27 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 03:33:08PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Replicate the same behavior as what's done with kernel-doc.pl:
> > continue building docs even when there are exceptions.
>
> ...
>
> > + logger.warning("kernel-doc '%s' processing failed with: %s" %
> > + (cmd_str(cmd), str(e)))
>
> > + logger.warning("kernel-doc '%s' processing failed with: %s" %
> > + (cmd_str(cmd), str(e)))
>
> The prefix of the message is the same for different (semantically) places.
> Is it okay? (I would expect them to slightly differ, but I dunno if
> cmd here is the same, perhaps that's enough for distinguishing the two.)
I guess it should be OK, as the "%s" variables are the ones that will
actually help to provide a hint about the issue. See, in practice, if
one wants to check what crashed, the procedure would likely be to run
the command line, given by "cmd_str(cmd)" and see what output was produced.
Regards,
Mauro
