Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some kernel-doc fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 03:33:05PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> Let me consolidate some patches on a single PR to make life simpler
> for you. Those should address Stephen and Akira's concerns with
> regards to KernelDoc class usage via sphinx kerneldoc.py extension.
> 
> Patch 1:	don't let Sphinx suppress errors/warnings;
> Patch 2:	fix a KeyError when trying to acess data from non-existing files;
> Patch 3:	add try/except blocks to avoid crashes when handling bad
> 	kernel-doc markups;
> Patch 4:	makes Lore and kernel-doc ML receive patches related
> 	to kernel-doc.py and get_abi.py.
> 
> Patches 1 to 3 were already submitted on separate series. Patch 4 is new.

Can we actually utilise CONFIG_WERROR to fail the build. If yes, the build will
be failed. This is in align with the warnings in the C code.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux