On 20/05/2025 06:14, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > NACK the whole series. > > Usama - I explicitly said make this an RFC, so we can see what this > approach _looks like_ to further examine it, to which you agreed. And now > you've sent it non-RFC. That's not acceptable. > > If you agree to something in review, it's not then optional as to whether > you do it. It was a bit late yesterday and I completely forgot to change --subject-prefix="PATCH v3" to --subject-prefix="RFC v3". Mistakes happen and I apologize. I agreed to make it RFC and had full intention of doing that. Would you like me to resend it with the RFC tag? Thanks, Usama
