Guenter wrote: > This is potentially unsafe if not really supported, which needs to be mentioned. Thank you for your comment. I will add a note of "potentially unsafe" in v2. We are considering installing ACPI power meter on a machine under development, but I believe that the DMI (SYS_VENDOR) check included in the driver has too broad a scope. I will update the code if the appropriate conditinon is determined, but I would like to correct the document first. Shinji
