* Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 12:15:33PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > @@ -173,10 +173,10 @@ For example, when an old kernel is running on new hardware. > > The kernel disabled support for it at compile-time > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > -For example, if 5-level-paging is not enabled when building (i.e., > > -CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL is not selected) the flag "la57" will not show up [#f1]_. > > +For example, if Linear Address Masking (LAM) is not enabled when building (i.e., > > +CONFIG_ADDRESS_MASKING is not selected) the flag "lam" will not show up. > > Even though the feature will still be detected via CPUID, the kernel disables > > -it by clearing via setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LA57). > > +it by clearing via setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LAM). > > LOL, good one. > > The rest looks nice and good to me. And FWIW, it boots fine on my Zen5 with > 5lvl enabled. > > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx> What's your preference on timing? v6.17 or v6.16? Thanks, Ingo
