Re: [PATCH v10 03/13] x86/msr-index: define AMD heterogeneous CPU related MSR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mario Limonciello <superm1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Introduces new MSR registers for AMD hardware feedback support.
> These registers enable the system to provide workload classification
> and configuration capabilities.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index b7dded3c81132..8e6db9a9f53c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -732,6 +732,11 @@
>  #define MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL		0xc0000301
>  #define MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR	0xc0000302
>  
> +/* AMD Hardware Feedback Support MSRs */
> +#define AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS_CONFIG      0xc0000500
> +#define AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS_ID          0xc0000501
> +#define AMD_WORKLOAD_HRST              0xc0000502

Can we follow the existing pattern of MSR_AMD64_* or MSR_AMD_* that 99% 
of the indices in this header are following?

Thanks,

	Ingo




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux