On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:49:11AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:21:37PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > > Then when the command is over the core code either aborts or finalizes > > > the objects in the iommufd_ucmd. This way you don't have to expose > > > abort and related to drivers. > > > > I see! Do you want this to apply to the all objects or just driver > > allocated ones? > > I would do all the ones that can work that way easily > > I think it would just be one patch, replace this patch with that one. > > > We would need a bigger preparatory series to roll out that to all > > the allocators, and need to be careful at the existing abort() that > > intertwines with other steps like an unlock(). > > Those cases with special locking couldn't use it. OK. I will add a patch in v5, replacing this one. Thanks Nicolin
