[PATCH net-next v5 1/5] pldmfw: Don't require send_package_data or send_component_table to be defined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not all drivers require send_package_data or send_component_table when
updating firmware. Instead of forcing drivers to implement a stub allow
these functions to go undefined.

Signed-off-by: Lee Trager <lee@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c b/lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c
index 6264e2013f25..b45ceb725780 100644
--- a/lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c
+++ b/lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c
@@ -728,6 +728,9 @@ pldm_send_package_data(struct pldmfw_priv *data)
 	struct pldmfw_record *record = data->matching_record;
 	const struct pldmfw_ops *ops = data->context->ops;

+	if (!ops->send_package_data)
+		return 0;
+
 	return ops->send_package_data(data->context, record->package_data,
 				      record->package_data_len);
 }
@@ -755,6 +758,9 @@ pldm_send_component_tables(struct pldmfw_priv *data)
 		if (!test_bit(index, bitmap))
 			continue;

+		if (!data->context->ops->send_component_table)
+			continue;
+
 		/* determine whether this is the start, middle, end, or both
 		 * the start and end of the component tables
 		 */
--
2.47.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux