On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 12:38:47PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 05:34:56PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 12:21:31PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote: > > > Document some interesting interactions that occur when exposing CXL > > > memory capacity to page allocator. > > > > We should not do this. Asking the page allocator for memory (eg for > > slab) should never return memory on CXL. There need to be special > > interfaces for clients that know they can tolerate the added latency. > > > > NAK this concept, and NAK this specific document. I have no comment on > > the previous documents. > > This describes what presently exists, so i'm not sure of what value a > NAK here is. > > Feel free to submit patches that deletes the existing code if you want > it removed from the documentation. Who sneaked that in when?
