On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 08:47:21AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c
> index 35f521e5f41c..a539eeb0bfc0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c
> @@ -1098,6 +1098,12 @@ static const struct hwcap_data {
> .sigill_fn = hbc_sigill,
> .sigill_reliable = true,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "MTE_FAR",
> + .at_hwcap = AT_HWCAP3,
> + .hwcap_bit = HWCAP3_MTE_FAR,
> + .cpuinfo = "mte_far",
> + },
> };
This is all good but I'd also like to see a test to check the FAR_EL1
bits are actually exposed to the signal handler when the hwcap is
present.
--
Catalin
