On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:32:44PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> This would work, but would still need to track if "no" known bits were set
> to emit an "unknown" message.
>
> So the loops end up being for() and check a bit or while (true) and
> find_next_bit() and otherwise identical.
>
> At that point does it really buy much more than the while (true) approach
> and find_next_bit()?
I have the requirements now, thanks. Lemme hack it up tomorrow, on a clear
head.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
