Re: [PATCH 4/5] hwmon: pmbus: mpq8785: Implement voltage scale loop configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/28/25 15:13, Pawel Dembicki wrote:
Implement support for setting the VOUT_SCALE_LOOP PMBus register
based on an optional device tree property "voltage-scale-loop".

This allows the driver to provide the correct VOUT value depending
on the feedback voltage divider configuration for chips where the
bootloader does not configure the voltage scale.

Signed-off-by: Pawel Dembicki <paweldembicki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mpq8785.c | 10 ++++++++++
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mpq8785.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mpq8785.c
index e6a643856f08..6e2325d7f37b 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mpq8785.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mpq8785.c
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ static int mpq8785_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
  	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
  	struct pmbus_driver_info *info;
  	enum chips chip_id;
+	u32 voltage_scale;
+	int ret;
info = devm_kmemdup(dev, &mpq8785_info, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!info)
@@ -105,6 +107,14 @@ static int mpq8785_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
  		return -ENODEV;
  	}
+ if (!of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "voltage-scale-loop",
+				  &voltage_scale)) {
+		ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(client, PMBUS_VOUT_SCALE_LOOP,
+						voltage_scale);

Per PMBus specification this value can be in any supported scale.
Also, the chips do not support the full 16-bit value range. I see 10 bit for
mpq8785 and mpm3695, 7 bit for mp2853, and 12 bit for MPM82504. There will
have to be some device specific range check.

I don't understand the units. The devicetree document talks about
VOUT_SCALE_LOOP = VFB / VOUT * 1000, but I don't see how that translates
into chip values. For MPM82504, the datasheet says 1 LSB=2mV. For mpm3695
it is 0.001/LSB. I have no idea how that is supposed to translate to the
units suggested in the property patch.

Either case, I think the property needs to be something generic that is well
defined. Maybe "pmbus,voltage-scale-loop", but I really don't know what would
be acceptable for DT maintainers.

Guenter





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux