Re: [PATCH v10 23/24] nvme-pci: convert to blk_rq_dma_map

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:46:19AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:22:29PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > +	do {
> > +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(mapped == entries)) {
> > +			iter.status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +		nvme_pci_sgl_set_data(&sg_list[mapped++], &iter);
> 
> I think this should say "++mapped" so that the data blocks start at
> index 1 (continued below...)
> 
> > +		iod->total_len += iter.len;
> > +	} while (blk_rq_dma_map_iter_next(req, dev->dev, &iod->dma_meta_state,
> > +				 &iter));
> >  
> > -out_unmap_sg:
> > -	dma_unmap_sgtable(dev->dev, &iod->meta_sgt, rq_dma_dir(req), 0);
> > -out_free_sg:
> > -	mempool_free(iod->meta_sgt.sgl, dev->iod_meta_mempool);
> > -	return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> > +	nvme_pci_sgl_set_seg(sg_list, sgl_dma, mapped);
> 
> because this here is setting sg_list index 0 to be the segment
> descriptor.
> 
> And you also need to increment sgl_dma to point to the element after
> sg_list, otherwise it's pointing right back to itself, creating a looped
> list.

Thanks for pointing to the difference between data_map and metadata_map,
I see it now:
        sgl_dma += sizeof(*sg_list);
	nvme_pci_sgl_set_seg(sg_list, sgl_dma, entries);
	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, entries, i)
	        nvme_pci_sgl_set_data(&sg_list[i + 1], sg);

Thanks

> 
> > +	if (unlikely(iter.status))
> > +		nvme_unmap_metadata(dev, req);
> > +	return iter.status;
> >  }