Hi Reinette, On 4/16/25 11:18, Reinette Chatre wrote: > Hi Babu, > > On 4/15/25 11:48 AM, Moger, Babu wrote: >> Hi Reinette, >> >> On 4/11/25 16:44, Reinette Chatre wrote: >>> Hi Babu, >>> >>> On 4/3/25 5:18 PM, Babu Moger wrote: >>>> By default, each resctrl group supports two MBM events: mbm_total_bytes >>>> and mbm_local_bytes. To maintain the same level of support, two default >>>> MBM configurations are added. These configurations will initially be used >>>> to set up the counters upon mounting, while users will have the option to >>>> modify them as needed. >>> >>> This jumps in quite fast by stating that MBM configurations are added but >>> there is no definition of what an MBM configuration is. >> >> How about this? >> >> >> By default, each resctrl group supports two MBM events: mbm_total_bytes >> and mbm_local_bytes. These represent total and local memory bandwidth >> monitoring, respectively. Each event corresponds to a specific MBM >> configuration. Use these default configurations to set up the counters >> during mount. Allow users to modify the configurations as needed after >> initialization. > > I am still missing a definition of "MBM configuration". How about: > > "Each event corresponds to a specific MBM configuration." -> "Each event > corresponds to an MBM configuration that specifies the bandwidth sources > tracked by the event." Sure. > > ... > >>> >>> There seems more and more overlap with Tony's RMID work. Did you get a >>> chance to look at that? >> >> Looked little bit. Will have look bit closer again. > > I'll study that series next to catch up with Tony's plans. > > Reinette > -- Thanks Babu Moger
