* Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On April 12, 2025 10:15:27 PM GMT+02:00, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >* Mario Limonciello <superm1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> SB800 is pre-Zen stuff. It's "before my time" - I guess that's the > >> precursor to FCH being in the SoC but has the same functionality. > >> > >> So I'm thinking <asm/amd_fch.h>. > > > >I went by the SB800_PIIX4_FCH_PM_ADDR name, which is a misnomer these > >days? > > > >But yeah, <asm/amd_fch.h> sounds good to me too. Boris? > > I was aiming more for a header which contains non-CPU defines - i.e., > platform. But the FCH is only one part of that platform. But let's > start with amd/fch.h - "amd/" subpath element would allow us to > trivially put other headers there too - and see where it gets us. We > can (and will) always refactor later if needed... Yeah, agreed on opening the <asm/amd/> namespace for this. Thanks, Ingo
