Hello. On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 07:04:40PM +0530, Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Update documentation for memory.max to clarify that the reported value > is in multiples of the system page_size. The following example > demonstrates this behavior: This applies to any of page_counter-based attribute, not only memory.max. > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst > @@ -1316,6 +1316,9 @@ PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back. > Caller could retry them differently, return into userspace > as -ENOMEM or silently ignore in cases like disk readahead. > > + Note that the value set for memory.max is reported in units > + corresponding to the system's page size. > + There seems to be mismatch in whitespace to surrounding text. Also the wording would be more precise if it referred to 'multiples', not 'units' (units are simply bytes). Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
