On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 09:44:03AM -0700, Roman Kisel wrote: > Do you feel this is shoehorned in `struct device`? I couldn't find an > appropriate private (== opaque pointer) part in the structure to store > that bit (`struct device_private` wouldn't fit the bill) and looked like > adding it to the struct itself would do no harm. However, my read of the > room is that folks see that as dubious :) We'll need per-device information. But it is much higher level than a need bounce buffer flag.
