On 4/9/25 07:34, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote: > Yes, I like it more than just generating the addresses in the parenthesis. What > do you think about this naming? KASAN prefix and [k/u]addr since it's not really > the lowest/highest address in the whole LA, just in this KASAN compiler scheme. > And I changed 1<<56 to 2<<56 so it generates 0xFE00000000000000 instead of > 0xFF00000000000000. > > #define KASAN_HIGHEST_KADDR (void *)0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF > #define KASAN_LOWEST_KADDR (void *)(KASAN_HIGHEST_KADDR - \ > (2<<56) + 1) > #define KASAN_HIGHEST_UADDR (void *)0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF > #define KASAN_LOWEST_UADDR (void *)(KASAN_HIGHEST_UADDR - \ > (2<<56) + 1) Yes, that is much better.
