On 4/8/25 11:19, Mario Limonciello wrote: > I think it's still valuable to have it in documentation for anyone who > wants to read more about this. As we get issues that come out of the > woodwork I could see people punching the string into a search engine and > then being spit at debugging.rst and we can adjust documentation to tell > them what to do with it when it's not clear. How would that work when the documentation: > +31, Internal, SW sync flood event and the string don't match: > + if (value & BIT(31)) > + return "software sync flood event"; ?
