Re: [PATCH rcu 10/11] srcu: Add FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE Kconfig for testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 03:57:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 15:36, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 09:04:31AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 16:44, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() functions
> > > > map to __srcu_read_lock() and __srcu_read_unlock() on systems like x86
> > > > that have NMI-safe this_cpu_inc() operations.  This makes the underlying
> > > > __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() functions
> > > > difficult to test on (for example) x86 systems, allowing bugs to creep in.
> > > >
> > > > This commit therefore creates a FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE Kconfig that
> > > > forces those underlying functions to be used even on systems where they
> > > > are not needed, thus providing better testing coverage.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 536e8b9b80bc7a0a ("srcu:
> > > Add FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE Kconfig for testing") in linus/master
> > >
> > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -65,6 +65,17 @@ config TREE_SRCU
> > > >         help
> > > >           This option selects the full-fledged version of SRCU.
> > > >
> > > > +config FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
> > > > +       bool "Force selection of NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE"
> > >
> > > What am I supposed to answer here? "n" I guess.
> > > What about distro and allmodconfig kernels?
> >
> > Yes, you should select "n" unless ...
> >
> > > > +       depends on !TINY_SRCU
> > > > +       select NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
> > > > +       default n
> > > > +       help
> > > > +         This option forces selection of the NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
> > > > +         Kconfig option, allowing testing of srcu_read_lock_nmisafe()
> > > > +         and srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() on architectures (like x86)
> > > > +         that select the ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option.
> > >
> > > Perhaps this should depend on ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS?
> >
> > ... you are on a system selecting ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS and
> 
> So a dependency on ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS does make sense,
> doesn't it?

The FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE has no effect otherwise, so it cannot
hurt.  Again, please see below.

							Thanx, Paul

> > you would like to test the SRCU setup that needed only by systems that
> > do not select ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS.
> >
> > Ah.  I forgot to add "depends on RCU_EXPERT".
> 
> Yes, that makes sense.
> 
> > Apologies, I will fix this.  Does the patch show below do the trick?
> >
> >                                                         Thanx, Paul

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 2245ef8605a80726548253d885b4cadd97f69f3b
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Mar 25 07:31:45 2025 -0700

    srcu: Make FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE depend on RCU_EXPERT
    
    The FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE is useful only for those wishing to test
    the SRCU code paths that accommodate architectures that do not have
    NMI-safe per-CPU operations, that is, those architectures that do not
    select the ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option.  As such, this
    is a specialized Kconfig option that is not intended for casual users.
    
    This commit therefore hides it behind the RCU_EXPERT Kconfig option.
    Given that this new FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE Kconfig option has no effect
    unless the ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option is also selected,
    it also depends on this Kconfig option.
    
    [ paulmck: Apply Geert Uytterhoeven feedback. ]
    
    Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdX6dy9_tmpLkpcnGzxyRbe6qSWYukcPp=H1GzZdyd3qBQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
index b3f985d41717a..ceaf6594f634c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ config TREE_SRCU
 config FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
 	bool "Force selection of NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE"
 	depends on !TINY_SRCU
+	depends on RCU_EXPERT
+	depends on ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS
 	select NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
 	default n
 	help




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux