Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10-03-25, 11:45, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-03-25, 12:05, Yury Norov wrote:
> > >  /**
> > > - * cpumask_weight - Count of bits in *srcp
> > > + * cpumask_weight - Count of bits in *@srcp
> > >   * @srcp: the cpumask to count bits (< nr_cpu_ids) in.
> > 
> > Here nr_cpu_ids is also a variable. Why you don't prefix it with @?

Hmm, I thought @ is applied only to function arguments. Not sure what
should be done with nr_cpu_ids.

Akira ?

-- 
viresh




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux