On 2/27/25 12:57, Bill Wendling wrote: > I vastly prefer the first way if made "static __always_inline". 'static', for sure. But I'd leave the explicit inlining out unless the compiler is actively being stupid.
On 2/27/25 12:57, Bill Wendling wrote: > I vastly prefer the first way if made "static __always_inline". 'static', for sure. But I'd leave the explicit inlining out unless the compiler is actively being stupid.
|