Dear Javier,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 22.08.25 um 02:39 schrieb Javier Nieto:
Previously, h5_open() called h5_link_control() to send a SYNC message.
But h5_link_control() only enqueues the packet and requires the caller
to call hci_uart_tx_wakeup(). Thus, after H5_SYNC_TIMEOUT ran out
(100ms), h5_timed_event() would be called and, realizing that the state
was still H5_UNINITIALIZED, it would re-enqueue the SYNC and call
hci_uart_tx_wakeup(). Consequently, two SYNC packets would be sent and
initialization would unnecessarily wait for 100ms.
The naive solution of calling hci_uart_tx_wakeup() in h5_open() does not
work because it will only schedule tx work if the HCI_PROTO_READY bit is
set and hci_serdev only sets it after h5_open() returns. This patch
removes the extraneous SYNC being enqueued and makes h5_timed_event()
wake up on the next jiffy.
Great commit message, thank you. I’d appreciate it if you documented
your test environment, and maybe paste the logs (for the timestamps)
before and after, so others could easily reproduce the issue.
Signed-off-by: Javier Nieto <jgnieto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c
index d0d4420c1a0f..863ee93dd8a8 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c
@@ -213,7 +213,6 @@ static void h5_peer_reset(struct hci_uart *hu)
static int h5_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
{
struct h5 *h5;
- const unsigned char sync[] = { 0x01, 0x7e };
BT_DBG("hu %p", hu);
@@ -243,9 +242,11 @@ static int h5_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
set_bit(HCI_UART_INIT_PENDING, &hu->hdev_flags);
- /* Send initial sync request */
- h5_link_control(hu, sync, sizeof(sync));
- mod_timer(&h5->timer, jiffies + H5_SYNC_TIMEOUT);
+ /*
+ * Wait one jiffy because the UART layer won't set HCI_UART_PROTO_READY,
+ * which allows us to send link packets, until this function returns.
+ */
+ mod_timer(&h5->timer, jiffies + 1);
return 0;
}
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Kind regards,
Paul
