https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220419 --- Comment #3 from Anton Ekblad (anton@xxxxxxxxx) --- (In reply to Luiz Von Dentz from comment #1) > As far I know BE201 still use btusb, not really sure why a change to > btintel_pcie would have any effect on a device over btusb but perhaps there > is something changed that affect btintel which is shared between both. I don't think that is correct. lspci describes the card as "00:14.7 Bluetooth [0d11]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:a876] (rev 10)", Intel says it's an CNVio card [1] (which I think is pcie only?), the problematic commit only touches btintel_pcie.{c,h}, and btusb is not even loaded on my system (neither before nor after the regression). [1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/230079/intel-wifi-7-be201/specifications.html -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
