Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: ublk: fix behavior when fio is not installed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:42:52 -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> Some ublk selftests have strange behavior when fio is not installed.
> While most tests behave correctly (run if they don't need fio, or skip
> if they need fio), the following tests have different behavior:
> 
> - test_null_01, test_null_02, test_generic_01, test_generic_02, and
>   test_generic_12 try to run fio without checking if it exists first,
>   and fail on any failure of the fio command (including "fio command
>   not found"). So these tests fail when they should skip.
> - test_stress_05 runs fio without checking if it exists first, but
>   doesn't fail on fio command failure. This test passes, but that pass
>   is misleading as the test doesn't do anything useful without fio
>   installed. So this test passes when it should skip.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] selftests: ublk: fix behavior when fio is not installed
      commit: a3835a44107fcbf05f183b5e8b60a8e4605b15ea

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe







[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux