On 9/22/25 7:48 AM, Sahil Chandna wrote:
>
>
> On 9/22/25 5:28 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> A recent commit skipped dumping the usual "attempt to access beyond end
>> of device" message if the device size is 0 sectors, as that's a common
>> pattern for devices that have been hot removed. But while it stopped
>> that message, it also prevented returning -EIO for that condition.
>> Reinstate the -EIO return, while retaining the quiet operation for
>> triggering EOD for a device with 0 sectors.
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+4b12286339fe4c2700c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Reported-by: Sahil Chandna <chandna.linuxkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Fixes: d0a2b527d8c3 ("block: tone down bio_check_eod")
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 4201504158a1..a27185cd8ede 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -557,9 +557,11 @@ static inline int bio_check_eod(struct bio *bio)
>> sector_t maxsector = bdev_nr_sectors(bio->bi_bdev);
>> unsigned int nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
>> - if (nr_sectors && maxsector &&
>> + if (nr_sectors &&
>> (nr_sectors > maxsector ||
>> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector > maxsector - nr_sectors)) {
>> + if (!maxsector)
>> + return -EIO;
>> pr_info_ratelimited("%s: attempt to access beyond end of device\n"
>> "%pg: rw=%d, sector=%llu, nr_sectors = %u limit=%llu\n",
>> current->comm, bio->bi_bdev, bio->bi_opf,
>>
> Hi,
> I tested the patch and it *does not* reproduce the original syzkaller bug [1].
> Tested-by: Sahil Chandna <chandna.linuxkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com./bug?extid=4b12286339fe4c2700c1
Thanks for testing! And for reporting the issue in the first place.
--
Jens Axboe
